"At this point, Oversight Board is another attempt to appear accountable even while FB's leadership has set the board up for failure," Facebook critic and Color of Change president Rashad Robinson tweeted earlier this year. To some, the idea of an independent board comes across as a cop-out - a chance for Mr Zuckerberg and Menlo Park, California-based Facebook to avoid taking responsibility for the tough decisions that come with building a global platform. "That is a simple reality of the type of work the board is engaged in." "We are of course aware of the fact that those decisions will not please all stakeholders all the time," Mr Thomas Hughes, director of the Oversight Board administration, said in an interview about the board's role. He first announced plans for an "independent body" to review content decisions in late 2018, but the board did not start operating for almost two years.ĭuring that time, Mr Zuckerberg repeatedly defended his company's responsibility to protect freedom of speech and his desire to keep Facebook from becoming an arbiter of truth. The ruling will increase scrutiny of both the company and the Oversight Board, which was born out of a longstanding argument by chief executive Mark Zuckerberg that Facebook should not be making so many decisions about what speech is acceptable on its service. But Facebook is alone in its plan to outsource the decision about Mr Trump's future on the platform.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |